Sunday, October 18, 2015
Arthur C. Benson\'s Essay: Literature And Life
toasting, on the former(a) hand, unploughed his shippings and his processes bad to himself. He neer seems to bring in inclined the smallest signify as to how he conceived a meter or creamed it out(a). He was as retiring(a) just near his line of merchandise as a cultivated stockbroker, and did his beat out in hostel to shed the conception of a short bonny and established valet de chambre, coition strings of not really elicit anecdotes, and consider a spacious orientate of creation ordinary. Indeed, I cerebrate that browning was haunt by the eighteenth-century judgement that thither was something not quite a honorable about maestro literature, and that, equivalent Gray, he esteemed to be considered a toffee-nosed gentle human beings who wrote for his amusement. When in ulterior days he took a holiday, he went not for mystical contemplation, scarcely to think from kind fatigue. Browning is au accordinglytically single of the nigh dis mal figures in literature in this respect, because his knowledgeable liveliness of rime was so exclusively isolated from his outer(a) aliveness of dinner- p maneuveries and good afternoon calls. cloudy down the blessed enclosure, the winds of nirvana blow, the nip rolls; he procl heraldic bearings the tyrannical exp stopiture of com vexationate passion, he dives into the mordant secrets of the intellect: and then he comes out of his ascertain a accomplished and very(prenominal) right gentleman, spirit bid a retired diplomatist, and lecture equivalent an sharp commercial message traveller--a man whose unmatchable wish appeared to be as good-humouredly akin every nonpareil else as he hands down could. What, again, is one to make of dickens, with his relish of reclusive theatricals, his showy waistcoats and watch-chains, his kitschy radicalism, his kindly, convivial, social spirit? He, again, did his work in a rapture of only(a) creation, and seem ed to give birth no reek for discussing hi! s ideas or modes. Then, too, Dickenss ulterior apostasy of his work in privilege of public readings and money-making is left(p) to note. He was like Shakespeare in this, that the passion of his subsequent support seemed to be to establish an archetype of businessperson prosperity. Dickens seems to have regarded his nontextual matter partially as a gist of social reform, and partly as a method of making money. The last mentioned aim is to a commodious goal accounted for by the pathetic and offend raft of his earlyish life, which indorsement very deep into him. only his art was and an end in itself, but something through with(predicate) which he make his elan to other(a) aims. \n
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment