Peace Negotiations Between Arafat and Clinton :: Foreign Relations Media Coverage Essays

Peace Negotiations Between Arafat and Clinton Many 3rd world and communist countries are known for their censorship in the media, ranging from television receiver, radio, and the newsprints. point with these shortcomings they still are able to present a side of an issue. The individualistic world can dominate the meshworks of the media as well and also stick out certain amounts of censorship with only one side of a view. The expression the capitalistic world is able to dominate the media is by advertisement. Commercials and advertisements drive and present for the expenses of the news reporting agency or any other media. A company will not sponsor a television network or a newspaper if their stories and ideas do not reflect that of the sponsor. For casing if a company is owned and operated mostly by Jews, that company whitethorn not appreciate a newspaper or a television station to report against them or point out that many mistakes, much(prenominal) as accidental b ombings and killings of innocent by standers not only Philistines however Israelis as well, were caused by Jews. If that newspaper or television station reports against Jews or the withstanders of Israel they will not be endorsed or sponsored by that Jewish company, and if that newspaper or television station does not receive any support they cannot publish anymore document or broadcast their newscasts. In twain cases important sides of an issue are either addressed or not. The westbound coverage of the peace negotiations between Arafat and chairperson Clinton by the news media distorts and deletes facts only to ensure that Israel, the United States ally, will benefit. My latest readings of the Seattle Times and one of capital of Irans newspaper dealt with Mr. Arafats visit to the United States to speak with President Clinton in the White House about the Mid-East peace process. Both papers presented facts and expanded as well on some of those facts. When reading the Seat tle Times, the articles title read, Peace deal with Arafat, the title its self its letting us know that we have to deal with Mr. Arafat, that he moldiness be a hard negotiator. The article discussed how Mr. Arafat did not accept or totally agree with President Clintons peace plan. The Times made it nett that President Clintons plan was detailed and accepted by twain the United States and the Israelis.