The Social Conflict Theory Sociology Essay

The neighborly Conflict hypothesis Sociology turn upSociologists believe that there is four different ways of social conflict. about sociologists will spend the theoretical or perspective approach to aid seek. There ar a multitude of approaches that be used by sociologist but, the mainly stick to three types of theories. The first would be the structural available theory, then the social conflict theory, and fin all in ally the symbolic interaction theory. deep d protest these three approaches atomic number 18 several more ways to gain research (Conflict Theories, 2011).The social conflict theory tries to show that society creates conflict im clotheable to the inequalities that are present in everyday life. Most sociologists will use the macro level orientation theory simply because it takes society as a whole and shows how it shapes our lives. It uses terms like inequality, tycoon, authority, competition, and exploitation (Conflict Theories, 2011).Some of the examples that would be used in the social conflict theory are authority. sanction takes into account the family, patriarchy, race and ethnicality hierarchies of authority. In inequality there is family, health, and property. Inequality looks at how people are treated and how are perceived by early(a)s. then there is competition which shadower be anything from education, religion, to who will go everywhere when you pass some nonpareil on the street. Competition is ingrained in all of us from the eon we are born until the time we die (Conflict Theories, 2011).The might and exploitation do- nonhing go hand in hand. The people that are in superpower or come to power got that way by exploiting citizens along the way. Power, if not kept in check, willmake the downright of men corrupt. Once the corruption sets in they will use that power to exploit people along the way to gain more power (Conflict Theories, 2011).Karl Marx believed there two throngs of people in society, the wealthy an d the poor. He prove what would happen if one group decided to up rise against the other. He looks to see what would happen and what roles the people involved would take. Once the sides are elect and the revolt has begun, Marx will study the inner workings of the dominate relegate to see how they retain their status after the conflict has ended (Conflict Theories, 2011).Social conflict can be either used for good or bad. Take any uprising against the local government. In Somalia the people suck been fighting their government for equality and fairness. The government themselves are fighting its own people to keep the domination or power. All across time there is human uprising against those in power. The earlier battles were fought for land, the later battles are fought for greed, power, and wealth.Some examples of bad social conflict are the recent adjoin in school shootings, bombings, and over all violence that is plaguing the country today. regrettably the innocent by stande r is usually the one getting hurt or killed. This is not just limited to the United States it is all across the globe. Those that are in power want more power and wealth to control those who are less fortunate.So, the social conflict theory is about those in power wanting to stay in power and those not in powers wanting to gain power. Throughout time there have been many battles waged in the desire to gain power. It all began with Karl Marx and has evolved over time to structured many other theories about crime and what causes it.There is in like manner the practical(prenominal) theory this theory is about ones group gain, due to another groups loss. This can be brought on by limited resources, this can ternion to conflict. This can lead to more friction inside each group when they struggle for resources. This theory is a social psychological theory thought to relieve prejudice (Conflict Theories, 2011).An example for this would be immigration. With all the bombings, terrorist attacks, and violence from one ethnic group or religious group. With the recent Boston bombings, this will lead to a negative reaction to all immigrants of Muslim decent. It doesnt topic if they are of Middle Eastern decent, people will see just the gloss of their skin and automatically lump them into one category, terrorist.This theory can be traced back through history. It can be seen with the British and Native Americans, Whites and blacks, Japanese and American, and recently middle eastern and Americans. Most of these conflicts have happened over one ethnicity doesnt like what the other one believes, whether it is religion, politics, or moral standings.Muzafer Sherif did the famous study called Robbers Cave in 1954. He basically took two groups of teenage boys, put them in a camp, and had them compete against each other. He had 22 boys in the study, all middle class white boys. These boys all came from similar backgrounds and upbringing. He randomly assigned them to a group ( McLeod, 2008).In the first hebdomad of the experiment, the two groups bonded with each other. The boys chose group names and stenciled them on their clothing and a flag. They bonded over hiking, swimming, and hanging out. This created and attachment that bonded the boys together (McLeod, 2008).In the second week he challenged the boys to competitions against the other group. He used activities like, baseball, tug-of-war and other games. The winning group would receive a trophy at the end of the competition. He also included individual prizes to create competition against the other group and within the groups (McLeod, 2008).The boys became physically, verbally, and mentally abusive towards each other. They burned each others flags, tore up sleeping areas, and had to be physically restrained by the researchers. This study showed that it doesnt matter where you come from, you can turn to prejudice (McLeod, 2008).Then there is the gamy surmisal which states investigates the strategic behavior of decision makers who are aware that their decisions locomote one another (Skekel, 2013). The swordplay theory believed that people interacted with each other similar to a game. This was done by strategic moves, winners and losers, rewards and punishments, or cyberspace and cost. It was the first model used to describe how the human population interacts (Game Theory An Overview, 2013).So, with this theory you will have players, strategies, and consequences just like in a game. There are many types of games like zero-sum game, non-zero sum game, simultaneous move games, sequential move games, one-shot games, and repeated games. These games are used to study the gaming theory (Game Theory An Overview, 2013).A popular gaming theory is the prisoners quandary. The prisoners dilemma shows why two individuals might not take hold, even if it appears that it is best to agree (Game Theory An Overview, 2013). They use two people who have committed a crime and pit one against the other. The sentencing is done by how the criminals talk, or not talk. If one partner talks, they get sentenced and the other set free. If they two stop quiet they get a short sentence, if they both talk they both get a moderate sentence. They never reveal what the prisoners chose to do (Game Theory An Overview, 2013).